Half Arsed is Not Good Enough When It Comes To Standards
So, it’s Saturday and I am checking out a bit of the competition, like you do. I work hard with others at The Escape to ensure our website is as good as it can be - it’s what we do and we should be walking the walk - so it’s good to see what other people are up.
Now, a year or so ago, Accessibility was a relatively unknown topic and some would argue it still is. At The Escape, we have been driven, mainly by our web team, to adhere to W3C standards for the past two and a half years (at least) and it has become second nature and standard practice.
So, when I take a look at the websites of our local competition and they talk about accessibility and DDA Compliancy it can only be a good thing (that other people are adopting standards). Or can it?
Half Arsed and Lazy
So, this is the rant. I don’t call myself a programmer but I can do basic coding. With the help of my colleagues I have learned. I have come to understand that it is actually easier to code to Strict validation standards than it was the old way with tables and frames and invisible Gif files to pad out web pages. Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and semantic markup are not only important, but essential, on a modern day website.
So, it really p*sses me off when I see Companies sell their services as DDA this and that, accessible this and compliant that and their own websites are transitional in validation not strict. This, in MY opinion, basically means that they either don’t fully understand ‘Accessibility’, and see ‘disability’ and ‘law’ as a good sales tool, or, they are simply to lazy to do it properly. Either way I think it is misleading to people buying websites and it gets my goat.
Many a time recently, I have had meetings with clients who didn’t know about accessibility, so I understand the lack of widespread knowledge out there. But they are buying something so it should be important to understand up front.
But, it is not just about disabled people. Yes, there is the DDA and I think that is a start but think about the (mobile) future. Frames, tables and Flash don’t sit well on a 2" screen.
Advice
If you are looking for a website designer, make sure they know their onions:
- Run their website through the Validator at W3C
- Learn About Accessibility
- Make sure that your website will not be built with tables and frames but with Cascading Style Sheets and Semantic Coding.
- Bear in mind mobile technology and other devices (ie. Screen Readers for people with bad sight need clear structure when reading a website.)
- Read the RNIB Best Practice Guide for Websites.
- Take It Seriously - there are 8.5 million disabled users in the UK alone and they use the web differently.
One thing I would especially watch out for is if you are going down the content-managed route. CMS systems are notoriously bad.
As for all those web designers out there - come on - you know it makes sense!





